Every home is a snowflake (or, how relying on transaction management alone cost this buyer $5,000)

TMCategory

I’m excited about the momentum and excitement around transaction management. A great product built by some great people got picked up last week and we can’t wait to see what they’ll build together. At the same time, lots and lots of new entrants are driving innovation in the category which is putting healthy pressure on brokers to get moving on picking a transaction management solution to manage the flow of paperwork and deliverables that accompany every transaction. Huzzah to that.

But I’ll be blunt: transaction management is only half the battle. Manage docs, signatures, and some initial deliverables. Set alerts for key deadlines. Store everything in one place. This is all a great start- but for the buyer, it truly is only a start. Let’s unpack a common transaction management task like “remove loan contingency” for a moment. Does reminding your buyer to remove their loan contingency or upload their loan commitment letter help them at all? “Hey Paul, go get your loan sorted.” Or, “Hey Paul, go get your inspections sorted.” Um, okay, but now what? Where do I start? What’s going to be expected of me? What can I do now, when I have X days left on this contingency, that is going to make this transaction go smoothly, or am I just going to be innundated with requests as they come with little to no warning? How can I avoid surprises?

A quick anecdote from my own homebuying experience: gosh the missus and I loved this house. Made an offer. Counteroffer. Signed contract. Credits. And then, the night before closing, we get a call from our attorney:

“Looks like there’s a lien on the title. Yeah. Sewer assessment. Seller’s attorney says he’s not paying. Won’t show up to closing tomorrow.” 

I’m sure that wasn’t a fun phone call for him, but you can imagine how the wife and I felt. Certainly outrage at the seller for trying to pull such a dirty trick at the 11th hour, but that was nothing compared to the confusion. What about this needed to wait until the day before closing to be revealed?*

Turns out a lot of transactions don’t have title run until the last minute for various reasons. We can get into that in another post, but suffice to say that if I’d known it wasn’t something attorneys always do right after a buyer is in contract, I would have happily paid the few hundred bucks to make sure it got run with enough time to negotiate, plan, and rebut without our feet to the fire and a moving van ready to go (and hence the task in Closing Time “Verify title is clear of all liens and assessments,” due nice and early).

“But Paul, that’s your transaction. Such a corner case…most transactions don’t have liens that only show up the night before closing,” you might say.

And yes, you’d be right. And as we built Closing Time, we began to see a lot of transactions. And we started to see a lot of what appeared to be ‘corner cases.’ And then we saw that almost every transaction, in one way or another, is unique. Each one is a snowflake. Different financial circumstances. Different disclosures. Different buyers, borrowers, lenders, and different rules in different states, counties, cities, and developments. The couple who just got married and received cash they’re going to need to document for their lender, who were self-employed for half of last year and own another property out of state. You get the idea.

To summarize: sure, every transaction starts out looking pretty much the same, but 90% of the work a buyer is responsible for just isn’t represented by transaction management systems, and rightly so. If transaction management systems had to incorporate every situation, every snowflake, for every party and for every document in the transaction, they’d be unweidly and unusable yuckware instead of the amazing utilities they are today.

And this is where we see Closing Time making life easier for you, and making life a lot easier for your buyers. A fully customized conceirge that guides your buyer through that 90% they have to manage when they’re buying a house, alongside and integrated with your transaction management platform. And in fact, in the coming weeks we’ll be announcing our first integration with one of the most prevelent transaction management platforms out there- so sending your buyer their plan toward closing will be as easy as clicking a button and letting our technology do the work. So that for each snowflake of a transaction, your buyer can feel confident and informed – and stay on track.

*So how’d my transaction work out? While state law (and our contract) indicates clearly that any assessments (sewer or otherwise) be taken care of by the seller, our seller was intent on nonperformance and dragging the transaction into a court battle, as he felt he agreed on too low a price anyway. Sadly, we wound up settling with him and paid a portion of the assessment to get him to close. Life before Closing Time

Why now? (or, 3 reasons why innovation is happening in real estate this time)

A couple months back, Bill Wendel from Real Estate Cafe asked a good question about the whole “Fixing Real Estate” crusade we’re on. To paraphrase, he basically asked ‘what about the 20+ years of similar initiatives that failed before it?’ (N.B.: for a really interesting deep-dive into this question, see here.)

Why IS this time any different?

1. The consumerization of the enterprise.

That’s a hoity-toity way of saying the iPhone, Android phones, tablets, and easy but indispensible tools like Gmail are showing people the delight and accessiblilty of powerful software. That applications need not be a hassle, and that technology can be friendly. This is especially important in the real estate space that traditionally has been populated by very enterprise-y, monolithic platforms that frankly look silly next to that iPhone now. Agents and brokers are beginning to expect the same delightful experience from their work tools as they do their personal tools.

2. Consumers demand it.

Screen Shot 2013-03-11 at 3.45.03 PM

It’s convenient to say this is a Gen Y or “Millenial” thing. This is not that thing. This study makes it seem somewhat like the largest demographic using the web as a tool for buying a house is 25-34. Except, the largest demographic that uses the web to buy a home is people over 35 (adding up the bands). Yes, Millenials think they can Google their way out of any challenge these days. But guess what: their parents do too.

3. Zillow & Trulia IPOs

In the last year or so, these two sites IPO’d to join Move, Inc as large, public entities focused on making the home buying experience better. While this is more than great for the founders and early employees of these companies, it’s actually just as great for the ecosystem as a whole and super-great for startups. Here’s the thing: for many, building a startup is often a thankless, stressful, high-risk endeavor that leads to maxed out credit cards and lost savings. Clearly this didn’t happen to Zillow’s and Trulia’s founders, but not everybody is building businesses that go public. Yet, many on the “chart” are building great things that deliver tremendous value. Now they have a set of potential acquirers where they can roll up into a larger entity that does deliver scale. Just today Trulia announced its $150M follow-on offering to do just this: buy smaller companies. More demand on the buy-side means more supply, means more brilliant founders pouring their sweat equity into innovation. While this ecosystem is nowhere near frothy, it’s the trajectory that matters. This is what VCs need to invest. And VC is often what startups need to take huge risks and build difficult things.

So what?

We’re already starting to see real changes happening. Today’s Docusign / Cartavi acquisitionDotloop citing some amazing adoption stats that point toward paperless transactions becoming a reality. Doorsteps getting acquired by Move, Inc. to continue their mission to humanize the buying process. These may be just a few data points, but together they’re a bellwether. I’d say watch this space.

Let’s be friends: why fixing real estate means being a good partner

PlayNice

One interesting observation I had from building the “Fixing Real Estate-Scape” chart was the trend of a single company playing in 2, 3 sometimes 4 boxes (let’s exclude those examples that got there by acqusition, that’s a different discussion). And these aren’t little boxes either: they’re huge things like CRM and Transaction Management. Often the pitch is “we do it all- we’re your one-stop-shop to greatness.” While I have a deep admiration for these companies, they’re taking on a tremendous risk by focusing on so many solutions all at once. Put simply, by being everything to everybody, they have a good chance of being nothing to nobody. It’s exceedingly rare for a single company to be great at lots of things. I’d say this is doubly true for sub-$100M cap private companies.

For this to work, we have to be interoperable

It’s incredibly tempting for entrepreneurs to build it all. The revenue projections look so much better when you’re getting X% of many categories, and you feel like you’ve diversified out your risk by putting your eggs in lots of baskets. Except instead of doing one thing well, this kind of company does a lot of things sorta well. And, they don’t spend any time worrying about how their CRM solution will plug in to someone else’s Transaction Management or vice versa. So we get stuck with lots of monolithic platforms that don’t talk to one another and create high switching costs and thus disincentivize innovation.

Going deep on solving a problem and embracing interoperability means more innovation and more success for all

Real estate technology does not need a bunch of sorta-good products. For example, complexity of a transaction between a buyer, a seller, two agents, and the myriad of people involved in making it happen is enough of a problem that it needs its own solution, maybe several solutions that focus on different aspects of the problem. Document management is one, transaction management is another, and what we’re doing at Closing Time to help buyers navigate escrow is yet another. If this sounds complex and fragmented, I’ll point you to a much messier chart that represents an ecosystem that is killing it and growing at an enormous pace because smart companies are focusing on deeply solving smaller pieces of the problem to make the whole more successful.

But one thing that other messy ecosystem had to embrace was interoperability. Most of the boxes in that chart partner with other boxes in the chart, in some cases with most or all of the companies in each box. In my short time in this industry, I’ve already heard war stories from technology entrepreneurs that repeatedly hear “no, we don’t want to partner because we plan to build that ourselves.” There are cases where this makes sense. But should we spend time building more features that already exist within other companies (duplicative work) or should we just partner with them and spend our time on things that don’t exist?

This is our philosophy at Closing Time, and it’s why we aren’t building things that already exist. Many of our early beta customers asked for document management and electronic signature features- we directed them to platforms that do this better than we could. We know we can go very deep on the one problem we’re trying to solve, and that will keep us busy why the rest of the ecosystem innovates on the other stuff. And I, for one, can’t wait to plug in to all that great stuff.

Doing our part: Closing Time enters public beta


As reported today in AllThingsD, we’ve officially entered public beta with Closing Time: our humble (but hopefully impactful) contribution to the landscape of those fixing real estate.

What is Closing Time, you ask? It’s an application to simplify the process of buying a house – specifically the period after the contract is signed and buyers get innundated with dozens of mission-critical tasks and deliverables. It’s a tool for agents to help their buyers stay on track, on task, and march toward their closing date with confidence. With a few pieces of key information (like contract sign date, escrow closing date, loan contingency date, etc.) Closing Time automatically generates a dynamic, constantly updating checklist for your buyers that’s intuitive easy to use. Agents can check in on a buyer’s progress getting their W-2s together, scheduling inspections, or any other of the many activities necessary to make sure the deal gets done.

But don’t take our word for it – sign up for a free trial account today. Or watch the video above for a quick tour. And keep watching this space!

Introducing the Fixing Real Estate-scape

FixingRealEstateScape_June2013

Welcome to our (early) attempt at a tribute to the companies – all 200+ of them – that are taking on the mission of making the process of buying a house easier (the “latte vision“) by building technology to power real estate. These are the “Fixers” in Fixing Real Estate. (Also: check out analysis of this chart in Business Insider and Inman News)

A few notes/caveats/apologies:

  1. This is a work in progress – and I’d love your feedback on what’s missing. This is v0.1 of what I hope will be a valuable guide to the innovation that’s happening around us in real estate technology. Comment below or send me your thoughts. I can fix stuff here pretty fast. :)
  2. The Fixing Real Estate-scape (as awkward as that sounds) was built from the perspective of how the industry is fixing the buyer’s experience of buying a house. Thus, I’m sure there are holes where some pretty amazing tools to help sellers should be. Frankly I think it could even garner a second chart.
  3. This is missing the entire ecosystem around mortgages. While that industry is crucial to the process of buying a house, it’s so complex itself that it needs its own chart.
  4. This is based on similar charts made by an investment banker named Terence Kawaja at LUMA Partners. We owe him thanks.
  5. Feel free to use this chart and repurpose it as you wish. We only ask that you attribute to the source.

M&A Analysis

I’ve also taken a first stab at identifying the acquired companies (of the last few years) in the space. In doing so, some interesting trends emerged about M&A in real estate tech:

  • Unlike advertising technology (my and Jonathan’s erstwhile stomping grounds) and other similarly hyped-up industries, acquisition values in the residential real estate tech space have been generally quite low. ~$30M seemed to be on the high end of things (Zillow/Mortech, Zillow/Hotpads, MarketLeader/RealEstate.com, Move/TigerLead being good examples of transactions below this number).
  • This might owe to the fact that, until now, there wasn’t really a healthy cadre of strategic acquirerers. With Zillow and Trulia as public companies in billion dollar valuation territory, I suspect this trend will change.
  • Lots of bootstrapping / non-VC funded companies in this ecosystem. This is probably good, but I would guess that as acquisition values go up, so will VC interest in this space. Things will get frothy at a certain point.

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and feedback!

-Paul Knegten (co-founder, COO & Amitree)

Let’s fix it.

There has been a lot of discussion lately about the broken state of the real estate industry. Much of the conversation has been centered on technology and how it can help take the complexity and pain out of real estate transactions. As founders of a company which aims to address these very issues, this newfound fervor and industry introspection really strikes a chord with us. Both Paul and I bought our first homes over the past couple years – he in New Jersey, and me in San Francisco. Both of us had very mixed experiences. On the one hand, it was extremely exciting and joyful to search for and acquire the homes where we would build our lives and families (my son was just born this month here in our home!). On the other hand, despite having excellent agents who guided us through the convoluted process of buying a house, we still found ourselves confused and had to make a concerted effort to obtain control and visibility into our transactions. To be entirely clear – this was not the fault of our agents, but rather a lack of useful tools to help us, the buyers, in our process. So we’ve set out to change that for other buyers and their agents and are really excited about the first steps we’ve taken (more about that in a bit).

It feels as if we are on the cusp of some much needed change in the space. The conversations taking place are focusing on what parts of the process can be improved through technological tools. Lots of attention is being paid to paperless transactions and eliminating the incessant back and forth of documents that need review, signing, and compliance verification. And this is a notable problem that really does need solving, as do many of the other problems being discussed. However, ever since buying our homes, we have found ourselves wanting to solve a truly fundamental part of the process: all of that work that has to happen when a buyer goes into contract on their future home.

This is a complex problem and it’s hard to solve, but we feel it’s critical to try because buying a home is an emotional process and the closing process is usually the most stressful and challenging part. Strangely, despite the inroads many companies have made in building tools for other parts of the process (from listing search by companies like Zillow to document management from companies like DocuSign), little has been done to address the workflow for buyers when they are in contract. So we’re building Closing Time to do exactly that. Whereas when we bought our homes, we spent hours with our agents and spouses making checklists, putting reminders in our phones, and generally running around like crazy, we envision a world where Closing Time helps buyers and agents stay on top of everything they need to do in order to successfully acquire the home of their dreams. All while reducing the stress involved, and making it predictable and fun.

The way Closing Time does this is by asking you a series of questions about the property you’re buying – details about the contract (key dates, contingencies, etc.), financing, property type, and so on – and then using that information to construct a tailored checklist of tasks, where the dates and deliverables match your specific transaction. In doing this, our hope is to eliminate surprises and give buyers and agents a reliable and detailed overview of everything that needs to be done before closing. As the transaction progresses, you get automated reminders for the things you need to do and you check off what’s already been done.

I like to think that we’re off to a solid start. We’ve built what we consider to be the key pieces (those described above) and now we’re busy adding functionality that agents and buyers have been telling us will be valuable – from mortgage document management and inspection scheduling to task customization and localization (although we’ve built Closing Time with the San Francisco Bay Area in mind, it should work well in any state that uses escrow agents – we’ll be supporting attorney review states soon).

We’re proud to be amongst so many fine entrepreneurs, agents, buyers, and sellers who all envision a brighter future for the real estate industry. Please join us for the ride and help us shape Closing Time. We’re actively seeking agents and buyers to give it a whirl, so sign up and give us your feedback.